Archaeo-Physics, LLC - shallow subsurface geophysical survey
home
cases
methods
inquiries
contact
contact

Case Study

Mission San Antonio de Padua

Magnetic Field Gradient Survey

See also: Summary page - Electrical Resistance Survey - Ground Penetrating Radar Survey

Mission San Antonio de Padua magnetic gradiometer survey

Download data plot as .PDF file (zipped)

  • Dashed yellow lines bound a loosely defined negative linear magnetic signal. This may represent construction material that is lower in magnetic susceptibility than the surrounding soil.
  • Solid yellow lines encircle relatively high amplitude bipolar (significant positive and negative component) magnetic signal. This signal is in the vicinity of the possible tiled floors identified during the electrical resistance survey and may represent thermomagnetic fields associated with floor tiles, there is however, significant uncertainty in this interpretation (see general comments below).
  • A dashed green line traces linear high amplitude bipolar signal. This signal is consistent with signal observed over known iron pipelines in previous surveys. Blank areas represent regions were the magnetic signal exceeds the dynamic range of the FM 36.
  • A dashed blue line bounds the limits of the modern access road. High amplitude bipolar signal, often exceeding the dynamic range of the instrument, suggests there may be a pipe or utility line under the road.

General comments: As is often the case on historic archaeological sites, high amplitude bipolar anomalies dominate the magnetic field gradient image. These strong magnetic fields most likely represent objects possessing a thermomagnetic field. Examples of such objects include; historic iron artifacts, modern iron debris, fired floor tiles, fired roof tiles, fired ceramic artifacts, igneous or metamorphic foundation stones, hearths, or kilns. The amplitude of the recorded magnetic signal is strongly affected by the distance to the instrument sensors. For this reason, shallowly buried roof tiles (or other artifacts) will create a significantly stronger anomaly than more deeply buried floor tiles, even though their thermoremanent fields are probably very similar.
While many of these high amplitude thermomagnetic signals certainly do represent archaeological features or artifacts of interest, they can often obscure the more subtle induced magnetic anomalies. For this reason they are often referred to as signal clutter, and are difficult to interpret with any degree of accuracy.

 

Website ©2007 Archaeo-Physics LLC. Unless otherwise noted, materials from this website may be reproduced for nonprofit educational purposes; please cite or link to source page. This page last updated August 21, 2007